In case you had already forgotten after all the hysteria surrounding Michael Jackson’s death, Farrah Fawcett, one of the original Charlie’s Angels and a sex symbol in the 1970s, died yesterday. Her brave life was one of abuse and rape in the minds of countless millions of the patriarchy. This quote posted by newsted620 in the comments section of the Seattle Times in their article about her death sums it up perfectly:
“I still have that poster [Farrah] made when she wore that red bathing suit.
ABSOLUTELY SMOKIN'...! ! ! ! !”
Indeed, because she was regarded as beautiful, she was made into a sex symbol during the 1970s. She was pressured into making revealing posters of herself for the disgusting minds of perverts to masturbate to. In their heads, millions of men imagined themselves defiling Farrah in some way. How many times Farrah must have endured rape in the minds of so many during the course of her life must be unfathomable.
Normally this degradation would destroy a woman’s spirit. It would make her feel used and violated. Beauty, at least the way the patriarchy defines it, is not a gift but a curse. Women regarded as ugly are degraded through being reminded of their worthlessness to men on a regular basis while women regarded as beautiful are degraded in being treated as nothing but a sex toy by men on a regular basis. Who the woman is inside and what makes her human is never something any man cares about, though they may act as if they do in an attempt to veil their sick and perverted obsession of her body. This is evident through their lack of interest in even the most amazing of women who are considered to be “ugly”.
The fact that Farrah kept her head up and never let this abuse overcome her makes her an example to the oppressed women of the patriarchy everywhere. Her life is one to note for her bravery in the face of degradation and the maintaining of her spirit in defiance to the patriarchy. It is my only hope that she may finally find refuge from this abuse in death. Rest in peace, Farrah.
Friday, June 26, 2009
Tuesday, June 23, 2009
Racist France to Ban Burkas
Have you heard the news? The French government is considering banning burkas entirely. They have already banned the wearing of veils / burkas in their schools in 2004, but I suppose that wasn’t good enough for the white racists who want to see the Muslims of France eradicated. Now they’re taking it to a completely new level.
It’s pretty funny that the racist French consider getting rid of Muslim clothing but aren’t doing shit about the Christian symbols people wear and that are displayed in schools and who knows where else in France. Secularism? Nah, not even. The white racists, who are also religious loons, would never get rid of that. It’s more like the double standards of white racism on display for the whole world to see, likely with a bit of lunatic Christian crusading sentiment against "dirty" Muslims, too.
But that white racist Sarkozy denies that it’s even about “secularism”, or more appropriately, white Christian supremacy. He claims that it’s to protect the dignity of the women wearing burkas, where he thinks that burkas degrade these women. It may be an admirable sentiment, but not only is it not the real case, but it’s also ignorant of Muslim cultural practices. I suppose I’m asking too much from white racists to actually be aware of and understand non-white cultural practices, but I mean really. The burkas don’t degrade women in any way. Granted, there are plenty of patriarchal tendencies among Muslims and the degradation of women does occur, but the burkas and religion of Islam itself are not to blame and anyone who thinks so is being a ridiculously ignorant racist just like Sarkozy, and they would probably be white, too. But hey, who cares about learning about non-white cultural practices and just flood them all with strawmen, and using those strawmen, let’s go civilize these poor brown peoples and invoke the spirit of the white man’s burden. After all, as white racists, that’s our job…
Of course, while that’s still racist and wrong, it’s not the real case at all. The real case is much more racist. The racist French have been oppressing their Muslim population for decades and since the riots in France in 2005, the white racists have become fearful, just like the white racists in apartheid South Africa did. To the white racists, all Muslims = terrorists and they’re afraid of the Muslims hiding bombs in their burkas and blowing them up in the middle of a crowd. Never mind the fact that this is a bullshit ignorant strawman; to the white racist, such “minor” details don’t matter. This is the real motive and racism in France is running just as rampant as it is here in the racist United States. Don’t let the lip service toward the “equality” of the races fool you – a white racist is a white racist, whether he or she is French, American, British, or what have you.
It’s pretty funny that the racist French consider getting rid of Muslim clothing but aren’t doing shit about the Christian symbols people wear and that are displayed in schools and who knows where else in France. Secularism? Nah, not even. The white racists, who are also religious loons, would never get rid of that. It’s more like the double standards of white racism on display for the whole world to see, likely with a bit of lunatic Christian crusading sentiment against "dirty" Muslims, too.
But that white racist Sarkozy denies that it’s even about “secularism”, or more appropriately, white Christian supremacy. He claims that it’s to protect the dignity of the women wearing burkas, where he thinks that burkas degrade these women. It may be an admirable sentiment, but not only is it not the real case, but it’s also ignorant of Muslim cultural practices. I suppose I’m asking too much from white racists to actually be aware of and understand non-white cultural practices, but I mean really. The burkas don’t degrade women in any way. Granted, there are plenty of patriarchal tendencies among Muslims and the degradation of women does occur, but the burkas and religion of Islam itself are not to blame and anyone who thinks so is being a ridiculously ignorant racist just like Sarkozy, and they would probably be white, too. But hey, who cares about learning about non-white cultural practices and just flood them all with strawmen, and using those strawmen, let’s go civilize these poor brown peoples and invoke the spirit of the white man’s burden. After all, as white racists, that’s our job…
Of course, while that’s still racist and wrong, it’s not the real case at all. The real case is much more racist. The racist French have been oppressing their Muslim population for decades and since the riots in France in 2005, the white racists have become fearful, just like the white racists in apartheid South Africa did. To the white racists, all Muslims = terrorists and they’re afraid of the Muslims hiding bombs in their burkas and blowing them up in the middle of a crowd. Never mind the fact that this is a bullshit ignorant strawman; to the white racist, such “minor” details don’t matter. This is the real motive and racism in France is running just as rampant as it is here in the racist United States. Don’t let the lip service toward the “equality” of the races fool you – a white racist is a white racist, whether he or she is French, American, British, or what have you.
Monday, June 22, 2009
White Racism is Indicative in the Length of History Books
It’s funny when you go to the bookstore and check out the history books. You got a big section for American history, another big section for European history, another large one for World War I and World War II, and then there’s a basically everything else section that’s kind of smaller than the rest. Or in other words, inferior non-white history that we white racists don’t care about.
But that’s common knowledge. The more subtle thing is that when you actually compare the sizes of history books, you’ll notice that the lengths of non-white history books are always shorter. I mean, look at John Keay’s “India: A History” – 578 pages. 5000 years of Indian history and the white racist couldn’t even make it to 600 pages. That’s like a page for every 10 years. Compare that to G.J. Meyer’s book on World War I – 816 pages. That’s a period of only four years and he came up with over 800 pages. That’s like 200 pages for a year. But hey, it’s white history so detail actually matters.
If you want an even more telling example, the Cambridge Illustrated History of China is 352 pages, or about a page for every 12 years in China’s 4000 year old history. I suppose that’s pretty easy to do if you just gloss over all Chinese institutions and cultural thought since as white racists they don’t really care about it. Compare that to Norman Davies’ “Europe: A History” and it’s 1392 pages, or about one page for every two years in Europe’s 2500 year old history. Oh, now here’s something the white racists actually care about…
These books are among the top rated for the subject of each their histories. It’s pretty clear that given the shorter length for non-white histories, white racists couldn’t care less about it. All they care about is their racist white history, as is evident in their going through 1392 pages on the history of Europe from the beginning to present like it was the second coming. It’s sad. The day and age when white racists care about non-white history will be the day of liberation for non-whites worldwide.
But that’s common knowledge. The more subtle thing is that when you actually compare the sizes of history books, you’ll notice that the lengths of non-white history books are always shorter. I mean, look at John Keay’s “India: A History” – 578 pages. 5000 years of Indian history and the white racist couldn’t even make it to 600 pages. That’s like a page for every 10 years. Compare that to G.J. Meyer’s book on World War I – 816 pages. That’s a period of only four years and he came up with over 800 pages. That’s like 200 pages for a year. But hey, it’s white history so detail actually matters.
If you want an even more telling example, the Cambridge Illustrated History of China is 352 pages, or about a page for every 12 years in China’s 4000 year old history. I suppose that’s pretty easy to do if you just gloss over all Chinese institutions and cultural thought since as white racists they don’t really care about it. Compare that to Norman Davies’ “Europe: A History” and it’s 1392 pages, or about one page for every two years in Europe’s 2500 year old history. Oh, now here’s something the white racists actually care about…
These books are among the top rated for the subject of each their histories. It’s pretty clear that given the shorter length for non-white histories, white racists couldn’t care less about it. All they care about is their racist white history, as is evident in their going through 1392 pages on the history of Europe from the beginning to present like it was the second coming. It’s sad. The day and age when white racists care about non-white history will be the day of liberation for non-whites worldwide.
Sunday, June 21, 2009
Conservative Opposition to Universal Healthcare is a Genocide against Minorities
Whenever you ask a conservative moron about universal healthcare, they’ll always oppose it, usually justifying it with something along the lines of “oh, but that’s socialism and therefore bad” or “that’s too much government and therefore bad”. But that’s all a load of shit. Some conservatives might have deluded themselves into thinking that such justifications are legitimate, namely the libertarian fools out there, but in the end, it’s all simply the result of the racism all conservatives share.
Think about it. Who doesn’t have healthcare insurance? The poor. Why don’t they have healthcare insurance? Because they don’t have enough money, that’s why they’re poor. And who’s usually poor? The minorities! It doesn’t take a genius to put two and two together. Even I’d expect the conservative morons out there to be able to understand this much, but then again, I have been surprised in the past. Their idiocy is something of a marvel, I must admit.
When you think of somebody who is poor, what image pops into your head? In most cases, it’s a minority of some kind – perhaps black, Latino, maybe even Vietnamese or Cambodian. But almost never white. And indeed, why would conservatives want to help out the minorities of this country? Their entire ideology is founded on the ideal of white supremacy, where they wish to restore the white supremacist laws of the past and apply them today. This is the very nature of any conservative out there and it makes sense why no conservative would want to support universal healthcare.
But genocide? Isn’t that going a bit too far, you might ask? This is where I think too many liberals go too soft on the conservative morons. After all, if you can’t get health insurance, what happens to you? You might be able to get help at the emergency room, but then what? What about that surgery that would extend your life? What about those prescription medicines to treat your illness and ease your suffering? How about that chemotherapy or MRI scan? All of those are denied to you and the result? A reduced lifespan and a reduced quality of life.
Given that racism is behind the intent, even if subliminally, opposition to universal healthcare can most certainly be declared as a genocide against minorities and you better believe that it most certainly is. Conservatives have been doing everything possible since the founding of the United States to make sure that all minorities, if not already enslaved, are kicked out of this country or killed as quickly as possible. This is why Mexicans north of the Rio Grande were expelled after the Mexican-American War. This is why blacks were lynched and burned by the Ku Klux Klan after slavery was rightfully abolished. And today we are seeing it in denying minorities the healthcare they deserve. The conservatives will stop at nothing to see the death of all non-whites and to impose their white supremacist ideology over us all.
Think about it. Who doesn’t have healthcare insurance? The poor. Why don’t they have healthcare insurance? Because they don’t have enough money, that’s why they’re poor. And who’s usually poor? The minorities! It doesn’t take a genius to put two and two together. Even I’d expect the conservative morons out there to be able to understand this much, but then again, I have been surprised in the past. Their idiocy is something of a marvel, I must admit.
When you think of somebody who is poor, what image pops into your head? In most cases, it’s a minority of some kind – perhaps black, Latino, maybe even Vietnamese or Cambodian. But almost never white. And indeed, why would conservatives want to help out the minorities of this country? Their entire ideology is founded on the ideal of white supremacy, where they wish to restore the white supremacist laws of the past and apply them today. This is the very nature of any conservative out there and it makes sense why no conservative would want to support universal healthcare.
But genocide? Isn’t that going a bit too far, you might ask? This is where I think too many liberals go too soft on the conservative morons. After all, if you can’t get health insurance, what happens to you? You might be able to get help at the emergency room, but then what? What about that surgery that would extend your life? What about those prescription medicines to treat your illness and ease your suffering? How about that chemotherapy or MRI scan? All of those are denied to you and the result? A reduced lifespan and a reduced quality of life.
Given that racism is behind the intent, even if subliminally, opposition to universal healthcare can most certainly be declared as a genocide against minorities and you better believe that it most certainly is. Conservatives have been doing everything possible since the founding of the United States to make sure that all minorities, if not already enslaved, are kicked out of this country or killed as quickly as possible. This is why Mexicans north of the Rio Grande were expelled after the Mexican-American War. This is why blacks were lynched and burned by the Ku Klux Klan after slavery was rightfully abolished. And today we are seeing it in denying minorities the healthcare they deserve. The conservatives will stop at nothing to see the death of all non-whites and to impose their white supremacist ideology over us all.
Saturday, June 20, 2009
A Brief Introduction
First off, I hail from the city of Seattle and I go by the name of BitterHappiness. The name is something of an oxymoron. Despite that, there have been attempts to make sense of the phrase "bitter happiness", where it essentially means that one must sacrifice something important (such as love) in order to obtain something good that would make them happy (such as money). Thus you're happy, but there's a sense of bitterness to it from the sacrifice. Such is the way of life.
You will find that I often take quick stabs at groups of people, ideologies, and individuals themselves, typically in what most would consider the "leftist" realm of thought. I am also quite sarcastic about it, usually for my own amusement. As such, people often regard me as a bit of a troll, and that's why the name of this blog is "Insight into a Liberal Troll's Mind". Sort of a play off the accusation, if you will. Maybe you will be enlightened by what I have to say. Or maybe you can just fuck off. Your choice, though I do love a heated argument.
So without further ado, let us get down to exposing white racists for the racists they are, where great lulz shall ensue. Let us reveal the greedy and illogical nature of conservatives, where their ignorance is something of a marvel. And let us bring American imperialism out into the open, where we will be enlightened to the oppression and suffering of the world as a result of our very own American flag.
You will find that I often take quick stabs at groups of people, ideologies, and individuals themselves, typically in what most would consider the "leftist" realm of thought. I am also quite sarcastic about it, usually for my own amusement. As such, people often regard me as a bit of a troll, and that's why the name of this blog is "Insight into a Liberal Troll's Mind". Sort of a play off the accusation, if you will. Maybe you will be enlightened by what I have to say. Or maybe you can just fuck off. Your choice, though I do love a heated argument.
So without further ado, let us get down to exposing white racists for the racists they are, where great lulz shall ensue. Let us reveal the greedy and illogical nature of conservatives, where their ignorance is something of a marvel. And let us bring American imperialism out into the open, where we will be enlightened to the oppression and suffering of the world as a result of our very own American flag.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
