Saturday, July 11, 2009

KKK Leader Ron Paul Shows His Bigotry to the World in the Film “Bruno”

In Sacha Baron Cohen’s new mockumentary film, Bruno, where he plays as an Austrian homosexual fashion reporter, he managed to pull off a stunt on the former Ku Klux Klan leader, libertarian-conservative nutcase, and failed 2008 presidential candidate Ron Paul. The results of the stunt, to say the least, were beyond lol. Now, we all know that libertarians are impervious to any kind of logic and scientific reasoning. And let us not forget to mention that their bigotry of all kinds, whether it is racism, sexism, homophobia, etc. is well known as well. But what occurred in the movie Bruno is just icing on the cake.

Cohen, playing as Bruno, invited Paul to an interview over Austrian economics and during it, one of the lights purposefully broke. As a result, Cohen took Paul into a back room which was designed as a bedroom. Paul sat down and Cohen turned on some music and began dancing, making Paul very uncomfortable. It got to the point where Paul got up and exploded, screaming at Cohen and calling him a queer in a most derogatory manner.

Remarking on the event after the fact, Paul said “I'm probably going to have to apologize to my supporters because I think most of them are going to figure out why in the world didn't I sock this guy in the nose?” Indeed, Mr. Paul, you will have to explain this to them. Your supporters are the lowest kind of bigoted filth known to man. I’m sure any one of them would love to lynch a poor homosexual if they had the chance and you can see them smile at the thought of revoking homosexuals of their civil rights such as marriage. Your failure to punch Cohen in the face when you think so lowly of homosexuals perhaps reflects the fact that your message of bigotry and hate is no more than empty words and that when the time comes, you will run away into a little corner and cry. Psh. Typical libertarian.

But oh wait, was Ron Paul’s performance even indicative of any kind of bigotry toward homosexuals, or homophobia? Some people would contend that Paul’s reaction is not to be blamed for he was simply only surprised. Well, to be blunt, that’s all a crock of shit. Why would Ron Paul be so offended at Cohen flaunting his character’s homosexuality a little bit? Why would it scare him to the point where he’s noticeably uncomfortable and actually ran out of the room? The answer is clear – because Ron Paul is a bigoted homophobe! He is clearly intolerant of homosexuals and would probably like to see them all hanged, just like in the “old days” he so hearkens back to during his speeches. Anyone who doesn’t see this is willfully blind to reality and probably a bigot themselves.

To be fair, though, this isn’t really any kind of news. This sort of thing has been well known and it’s pretty obvious that libertarians are among the most intolerant political parties in the US today, just after the conservatives, which they’re closely aligned to in any case. But it is an eye opener for this scene does expose Ron Paul for the fraud and bigot that he is.

Saturday, July 4, 2009

What is There to Feel Patriotic For?

The 4th of July is today and you know what that means? All the flag waving conservative morons come out today and celebrate their prejudice. Oh? You’re confused? Allow me to explain.

The history of the United States has its roots in discrimination. Even before the Americas were discovered by Christopher Columbus in 1492, white racists were busy raiding and capturing slaves in West Africa for plantations back home in Europe or on the Canary Islands. They justified their enslavement of them through the belief that these dark skinned individuals were racially inferior. With the Americas and genocide of the Native Americans underway, this accelerated this slavery of Africans and the practice was quite common by the 1700s when the British colonies in America were thriving.

As such, you can see that it was blacks working on these plantations who made America prosperous and blacks who fueled American industry at all stages of its development. But of course, don’t count on the white racists acknowledging this. Instead, the white racists give these black slaves nothing but their undying hatred and abuse. It wasn’t at all uncommon for the white racists to make an unreasonable demand for the amount of cotton they wanted picked for the day, and then when their slaves fail to meet their impossible demand, a few are chosen at random to be whipped to the brink of death. And of course, you know the white racists smiled and enjoyed themselves as they did this. To the white racist, nothing feels better than the feeling of empowerment by inflicting unimaginable suffering on another individual.

Perhaps their hatred was manifested best through the very document that makes up our nation – the United States constitution. In it, it was decided that blacks counted as only 3/5 a human. The white racists denied blacks of their humanity since the beginning and the fact that such a racist clause was written into our constitution makes it completely null and void in my eyes. The constitution, in short, is a tool of the white racists for the oppression of non-whites and needs to be completely abolished.

It is this sort of thing which makes me continually ashamed to be an American. Being American is not something to be celebrated – rather, it is something to vilify. The United States has done nothing but racist evil throughout its entire history and it is beyond redemption. The only individuals who would be proud of this country are the white racists, who are typically conservative and flag waving morons. Only they can proudly express their happiness for the oppression of non-whites by the lighting of fireworks tonight and chanting America is great. I, on the other hand, will remain inside for tonight and do as I usually do. I shall take no part in this disgusting celebration of prejudice and white supremacy.

Friday, June 26, 2009

Farrah Fawcett Shamed and Defiled by Perverted Freaks

In case you had already forgotten after all the hysteria surrounding Michael Jackson’s death, Farrah Fawcett, one of the original Charlie’s Angels and a sex symbol in the 1970s, died yesterday. Her brave life was one of abuse and rape in the minds of countless millions of the patriarchy. This quote posted by newsted620 in the comments section of the Seattle Times in their article about her death sums it up perfectly:

“I still have that poster [Farrah] made when she wore that red bathing suit.

ABSOLUTELY SMOKIN'...! ! ! ! !”

Indeed, because she was regarded as beautiful, she was made into a sex symbol during the 1970s. She was pressured into making revealing posters of herself for the disgusting minds of perverts to masturbate to. In their heads, millions of men imagined themselves defiling Farrah in some way. How many times Farrah must have endured rape in the minds of so many during the course of her life must be unfathomable.

Normally this degradation would destroy a woman’s spirit. It would make her feel used and violated. Beauty, at least the way the patriarchy defines it, is not a gift but a curse. Women regarded as ugly are degraded through being reminded of their worthlessness to men on a regular basis while women regarded as beautiful are degraded in being treated as nothing but a sex toy by men on a regular basis. Who the woman is inside and what makes her human is never something any man cares about, though they may act as if they do in an attempt to veil their sick and perverted obsession of her body. This is evident through their lack of interest in even the most amazing of women who are considered to be “ugly”.

The fact that Farrah kept her head up and never let this abuse overcome her makes her an example to the oppressed women of the patriarchy everywhere. Her life is one to note for her bravery in the face of degradation and the maintaining of her spirit in defiance to the patriarchy. It is my only hope that she may finally find refuge from this abuse in death. Rest in peace, Farrah.

Tuesday, June 23, 2009

Racist France to Ban Burkas

Have you heard the news? The French government is considering banning burkas entirely. They have already banned the wearing of veils / burkas in their schools in 2004, but I suppose that wasn’t good enough for the white racists who want to see the Muslims of France eradicated. Now they’re taking it to a completely new level.

It’s pretty funny that the racist French consider getting rid of Muslim clothing but aren’t doing shit about the Christian symbols people wear and that are displayed in schools and who knows where else in France. Secularism? Nah, not even. The white racists, who are also religious loons, would never get rid of that. It’s more like the double standards of white racism on display for the whole world to see, likely with a bit of lunatic Christian crusading sentiment against "dirty" Muslims, too.

But that white racist Sarkozy denies that it’s even about “secularism”, or more appropriately, white Christian supremacy. He claims that it’s to protect the dignity of the women wearing burkas, where he thinks that burkas degrade these women. It may be an admirable sentiment, but not only is it not the real case, but it’s also ignorant of Muslim cultural practices. I suppose I’m asking too much from white racists to actually be aware of and understand non-white cultural practices, but I mean really. The burkas don’t degrade women in any way. Granted, there are plenty of patriarchal tendencies among Muslims and the degradation of women does occur, but the burkas and religion of Islam itself are not to blame and anyone who thinks so is being a ridiculously ignorant racist just like Sarkozy, and they would probably be white, too. But hey, who cares about learning about non-white cultural practices and just flood them all with strawmen, and using those strawmen, let’s go civilize these poor brown peoples and invoke the spirit of the white man’s burden. After all, as white racists, that’s our job…

Of course, while that’s still racist and wrong, it’s not the real case at all. The real case is much more racist. The racist French have been oppressing their Muslim population for decades and since the riots in France in 2005, the white racists have become fearful, just like the white racists in apartheid South Africa did. To the white racists, all Muslims = terrorists and they’re afraid of the Muslims hiding bombs in their burkas and blowing them up in the middle of a crowd. Never mind the fact that this is a bullshit ignorant strawman; to the white racist, such “minor” details don’t matter. This is the real motive and racism in France is running just as rampant as it is here in the racist United States. Don’t let the lip service toward the “equality” of the races fool you – a white racist is a white racist, whether he or she is French, American, British, or what have you.

Monday, June 22, 2009

White Racism is Indicative in the Length of History Books

It’s funny when you go to the bookstore and check out the history books. You got a big section for American history, another big section for European history, another large one for World War I and World War II, and then there’s a basically everything else section that’s kind of smaller than the rest. Or in other words, inferior non-white history that we white racists don’t care about.

But that’s common knowledge. The more subtle thing is that when you actually compare the sizes of history books, you’ll notice that the lengths of non-white history books are always shorter. I mean, look at John Keay’s “India: A History” – 578 pages. 5000 years of Indian history and the white racist couldn’t even make it to 600 pages. That’s like a page for every 10 years. Compare that to G.J. Meyer’s book on World War I – 816 pages. That’s a period of only four years and he came up with over 800 pages. That’s like 200 pages for a year. But hey, it’s white history so detail actually matters.

If you want an even more telling example, the Cambridge Illustrated History of China is 352 pages, or about a page for every 12 years in China’s 4000 year old history. I suppose that’s pretty easy to do if you just gloss over all Chinese institutions and cultural thought since as white racists they don’t really care about it. Compare that to Norman Davies’ “Europe: A History” and it’s 1392 pages, or about one page for every two years in Europe’s 2500 year old history. Oh, now here’s something the white racists actually care about…

These books are among the top rated for the subject of each their histories. It’s pretty clear that given the shorter length for non-white histories, white racists couldn’t care less about it. All they care about is their racist white history, as is evident in their going through 1392 pages on the history of Europe from the beginning to present like it was the second coming. It’s sad. The day and age when white racists care about non-white history will be the day of liberation for non-whites worldwide.

Sunday, June 21, 2009

Conservative Opposition to Universal Healthcare is a Genocide against Minorities

Whenever you ask a conservative moron about universal healthcare, they’ll always oppose it, usually justifying it with something along the lines of “oh, but that’s socialism and therefore bad” or “that’s too much government and therefore bad”. But that’s all a load of shit. Some conservatives might have deluded themselves into thinking that such justifications are legitimate, namely the libertarian fools out there, but in the end, it’s all simply the result of the racism all conservatives share.

Think about it. Who doesn’t have healthcare insurance? The poor. Why don’t they have healthcare insurance? Because they don’t have enough money, that’s why they’re poor. And who’s usually poor? The minorities! It doesn’t take a genius to put two and two together. Even I’d expect the conservative morons out there to be able to understand this much, but then again, I have been surprised in the past. Their idiocy is something of a marvel, I must admit.

When you think of somebody who is poor, what image pops into your head? In most cases, it’s a minority of some kind – perhaps black, Latino, maybe even Vietnamese or Cambodian. But almost never white. And indeed, why would conservatives want to help out the minorities of this country? Their entire ideology is founded on the ideal of white supremacy, where they wish to restore the white supremacist laws of the past and apply them today. This is the very nature of any conservative out there and it makes sense why no conservative would want to support universal healthcare.

But genocide? Isn’t that going a bit too far, you might ask? This is where I think too many liberals go too soft on the conservative morons. After all, if you can’t get health insurance, what happens to you? You might be able to get help at the emergency room, but then what? What about that surgery that would extend your life? What about those prescription medicines to treat your illness and ease your suffering? How about that chemotherapy or MRI scan? All of those are denied to you and the result? A reduced lifespan and a reduced quality of life.

Given that racism is behind the intent, even if subliminally, opposition to universal healthcare can most certainly be declared as a genocide against minorities and you better believe that it most certainly is. Conservatives have been doing everything possible since the founding of the United States to make sure that all minorities, if not already enslaved, are kicked out of this country or killed as quickly as possible. This is why Mexicans north of the Rio Grande were expelled after the Mexican-American War. This is why blacks were lynched and burned by the Ku Klux Klan after slavery was rightfully abolished. And today we are seeing it in denying minorities the healthcare they deserve. The conservatives will stop at nothing to see the death of all non-whites and to impose their white supremacist ideology over us all.

Saturday, June 20, 2009

A Brief Introduction

First off, I hail from the city of Seattle and I go by the name of BitterHappiness. The name is something of an oxymoron. Despite that, there have been attempts to make sense of the phrase "bitter happiness", where it essentially means that one must sacrifice something important (such as love) in order to obtain something good that would make them happy (such as money). Thus you're happy, but there's a sense of bitterness to it from the sacrifice. Such is the way of life.

You will find that I often take quick stabs at groups of people, ideologies, and individuals themselves, typically in what most would consider the "leftist" realm of thought. I am also quite sarcastic about it, usually for my own amusement. As such, people often regard me as a bit of a troll, and that's why the name of this blog is "Insight into a Liberal Troll's Mind". Sort of a play off the accusation, if you will. Maybe you will be enlightened by what I have to say. Or maybe you can just fuck off. Your choice, though I do love a heated argument.

So without further ado, let us get down to exposing white racists for the racists they are, where great lulz shall ensue. Let us reveal the greedy and illogical nature of conservatives, where their ignorance is something of a marvel. And let us bring American imperialism out into the open, where we will be enlightened to the oppression and suffering of the world as a result of our very own American flag.